Kathmandu. CPN-UML Chairman and former Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli has said that the attack on social order, economic system and destruction of our culture in the name of Genji movement is an attack on social order, economic system and destruction of the country by destroying our culture.

Giving a statement to the Gauri Bahadur Karki Commission, he said that the burning of industries has not burnt the country’s economy. He asked. He claimed that the arson and attack on all three government agencies was a planned incident.

“The parliament building, the administrative centre of the country, Singha Durbar, and the Supreme Court, the place where the sovereign people are represented, have the videos of those involved in the investigation and data were searched and burnt?

Here is Oli’s statement:

After the Tinkune incident of Kathmandu in Chaitra 2082 BS, all the security agencies were instructed to ensure that there is minimum loss of life and property in the context of such incidents and there should be no infiltration of undesirable elements. Since the Home Minister is the chairman of the Central Security Committee, the Home Minister has been asked to go to the Commission for answers as security sensitivity and information related to it is with the Home Minister. Many issues may have been revealed by the Home Minister’s reply. In fact, on September 23 and 24, an unimaginable and barbaric incident took place in the country.

It is not a matter of directly informing the Prime Minister about the immediate and immediate events that took place during the agitation by the Gianz generation on September 23. The Prime Minister does not give orders to the police, for this, the Home Ministry remains as a departmental ministry. Logically, the Prime Minister is not accountable for this. Attacking the security personnel, taking selfies by wearing security personnel’s uniforms and guns, etc., is definitely not the one who announced the movement, but the infiltration group took advantage of the movement. The GenZs have hijacked their demands, they have said that our intention was not this, it was a peaceful movement.

The attempt to burn down the parliament building took place on the 23rd. On that day, the group that fulfilled its objective by bringing the youths to the forefront of the movement has deliberately created a situation of provocation among the youths and created a situation of death and casualty. The arson and attack on all three agencies of the government is a planned incident. The parliament building, the administrative center of the country, Singha Durbar, the administrative center of the country and the Supreme Court, the place of justice disposal, were searched and the data was searched and burnt.

As the chairman of the National Security Council, he could sit down and give instructions, but the government wanted to minimize the use of weapons and prevent human casualties. Since the government had no intention of mobilizing the army, it was not done. In a discussion with the chiefs of the security agencies on the night of the 22nd, the security forces said that 6,000-7,000 GNZ will be peaceful. All my property was burnt and someone else’s personal property, which was sold 23 years ago, was also burnt. The only house in Tehathum district is mine and the commission has not done the work of questioning and taking statements of all these perpetrators?

Isn’t the burning of industries burning the country’s economy? There was an attack on the social system, an attack on the economic system, and an attack on our culture and the destruction of the country. In this way, investment can be promoted and the Prime Minister does not have the power to order the police to shoot in the incident of September 1. That’s not even the case. These technical questions must have been answered by the concerned people. After the incident on September 23, the government held a meeting in the evening and decided to form a judicial commission for an impartial investigation into the incident, provide effective treatment to the injured, provide relief to the families of the deceased and lift the ban on social media as demanded by the GenZ generation. I resigned on September 24. If there was a movement because I was an obstruction, everything should have been fine after my resignation, but wouldn’t it?

The government has decided on the regulation of social networks, there should be social media regulation. Shouldn’t there be accountability? I don’t. Yes, that’s why I made the decision. I have already given statements to the commission about the incident and have given their views publicly on the issue time and again.